Comparison table

Five assumptions about hiring a solo designer paired row by row with what actually happens, including one the block admits is true.

A three-column table comparing freelance and agency across seven criteria including cost, speed to start, and institutional knowledge.

A three-column table of five signals arguing honestly for hiring a freelancer or building in-house across project length, budget, and team structure.

Two engagement timelines side by side, a typical studio process against mine, with five numbered steps, timing labels, and an honest closing note.

Two engagement models compared down a central spine of six criteria, closed by paired pick this when lists so a prospect can self select.

Four questions to ask every designer you are comparing, each card pairing the question and why it matters with my answer below a divider.

A four step decision path where each numbered question branches into yes and no outcomes, ending in a short verdict panel.

A roster of four priced specialists beside my single generalist panel, where a three dot coverage meter rates my depth per discipline.

Two decision panels weighing a bought template against custom work, each with cost and timeline facts plus the signs it is the right call.

Three distinctive approach points each paired with an explicit tradeoff so the block reads as credible rather than promotional.

Two itemised cost ledgers pricing the same project through an agency and through me, with line notes, plain totals, and an honest caveat.

Four honest reasons as cards, each pairing a direct claim with the substance that makes it verifiable, the differentiation block.