Three tier pricing

A formula strip showing creation fee times usage multiplier equals final fee sits above four license tier cards, closed by notes on exclusivity.

A two-column prose block arguing why project pricing beats hourly, with three named reasons on the right and a pair of actions linking to a quote and the hourly rate.

Side-by-side included and not-included cards for a design package, followed by a ruled assumptions panel covering brief quality, feedback rounds, content readiness, and stakeholder access.

Two category panels list a la carte extras as divided rows, each pairing a name and one line description with a plainly stated price.

Three stacked budget bands pair a price range and engagement with a good fit list and a keep in mind list, the middle band flagged.

An hourly rate stated plainly with included and excluded item columns, a four-hour minimum, and a ruled list of three scenarios where hourly billing makes more sense than a fixed scope.

A three-package comparison table with Check and Minus feature rows, prices, and per-package CTAs in a scrollable layout.

Three numbered payment stages with percentage splits sit beside a worked example panel that breaks a project fee into three payments with terms.

Three package cards with price-from amounts, durations, and included item lists, with a recommended tier highlighted and an honest scoping note below the grid.

Two tier cards with from prices and included lists beside three plainly answered pricing questions that remove common objections.

Six common project types as ruled table rows showing price bands and timelines, with scope assumptions per row and an honest note that all figures are starting points.

A prominent day rate panel with a breakdown of half-day and retainer rates beside three plain-answer billing FAQ pairs.